Categorized | Opinions

Singer: Do ‘locals’ belong in Hawaii?

(Reader Opinions Disclaimer: This column allows members of the community to share their opinions and views, which do not necessarily reflect those of Hawaii 24/7, its staff, sponsors or anyone other than the writer. Hawaii 24/7 reserves the right to refuse any column deemed to be misinformation, of an unethical nature, a personal attack, or a blatant commercial pitch.)

Sydney Ross Singer | Medical Anthropologist, Biologist, Author

For the thousands of Big Island residents who hunt and gather for subsistence, the Big Island is about to get a lot smaller. The other islands are shrinking, too. But it’s not a geological phenomenon. It’s all political.

The Hawaii DLNR’s plan to fence off another 17 square miles of prime forest on the Big Island has brought hunters to the streets outside the DLNR early Monday morning to protest what they see as a progressive loss of their hunting grounds and a threat to their way of life.

Gov. Neil Abercrombie’s $110 million, 10-year The Rain Follows the Forests plan, focusing on replenishing Hawaii’s watershed, has targeted prime hunting grounds for a fence, weed, and kill campaign. For more information, visit: hawaii.gov/dlnr/watershed/The-…

Areas are fenced and the sheep, goats, deer and pigs inside will be eradicated, along with the plants that feed them, such as strawberry guava and banana poka (a passionfruit variety.) It is a forest make-over that pits conservationists against those who use these wild spaces to feed their families.

Local culture is a mixture of Hawaiian, Portuguese, Japanese, Filipino, Caucasian, and more, making locals as varied in make-up as the forests in which they have been hunting pigs and other game animals for generations. As the environment has changed with the integration of immigrant species, so have the people.

The problem is that these species, once appreciated and introduced by the government for their food value and the need for food sustainability, are now considered invasive species and are slated for destruction. This means the local culture, which has relied on these wild foods, is also feeling under attack.

Hunters have opposed the government’s plan to release an insect to attack the popular food, strawberry guava, which is not only a food for people but an important food for birds, pigs, and other game. Rose apple, another important wild food, has already been decimated by a fungus which hunters suspect was released by the government since it, too, is considered “invasive” and feeds pigs.

Meanwhile, government eradication of sheep and goats has made hunting increasingly difficult. And the recent proposal to declare much of the Hawaiian Islands as critical habitat for the endangered Monk seal will impact on fishing.

To those who feed their families from the land or sea, this environmental agenda feels like a direct threat to survival. To a culture that relies on “invasive” species for food, an attack on the “invasives” is an attack on their culture.

Of course, the DLNR is supposed to be sensitive to cultural rights. It realizes that hunters and their families will be impacted by the loss of prime hunting ground.

But the DLNR is ignoring the rights of local hunters. Why?

According to the text of the Rain Follows the Forest plan, “Although ungulate hunting is a contemporary recreational activity and a source of food for some, hunting (pig hunting in particular) is not a traditional Hawaiian practice. Reviews of firsthand testimonies in more than 60,000 native Hawaiian land documents dating from 1846 to 1910 revealed many references to pigs, but nearly every reference was in the context of them being near-home and being cared for (raised), not hunted.”

In other words, if the old Hawaiians didn’t do it, then it is not a protected cultural practice. It doesn’t matter how many generations have been doing it since the old days. If it wasn’t here before western contact or part of the culture before western contact, then it “doesn’t belong in Hawaii.”

Ironically, the DLNR is mandated to encourage hunting. They are mandated to introduce game. But the agenda has changed as the new environmentalism of invasive species control conflicts with old laws and ways. The environment is no longer for using to our benefit. It is for preserving as museums of the past.

Hawaii has been through numerous environmental agendas over the centuries that have redefined the use of these islands. The local culture is now caught in middle of modern change.

In the face of these changes, locals are out of time, like a culture of the past. Going into the forests and getting fresh and free food will be rare in the future, if eradication plans continue.

Instead, the lands and waters will be controlled, weeded and purged of aliens. Food will only be in supermarkets for those who can afford it. Alien species sympathizers, like the local culture, will have to change their ways, or move to the mainland where the cost of living is cheaper.

Environmental justice refers to protecting the poorer segments of society when government plans are made to alter the environment. The DLNR’s agenda of removing food from the forests is environmental injustice, and the local hunters protesting at 6 a.m. in front of the DLNR office in Hilo know that.

They realize that their local culture is now on the invasive species hit list.

(Sydney Ross Singer is a medical anthropologist and director of the Institute for the Study of Culturogenic Disease.)

3 Responses to “Singer: Do ‘locals’ belong in Hawaii?”

  1. Nicolai Barca says:

    Sucks for hunters, but there will still be plenty of pigs and other game for hunters to hunt even with all the fencing that has happened and is going to happen. Got to share and compromise with all the other user groups. Otherwise, you pit hunters against the water needs of the masses. Or you pit hunters against Hawaiian cultural practitioners who want native plants to harvest. Or against people who enjoy the beauty and biodiversity of native plants and animals. There needs to be balance. Hunting will always be available in the places where native ecosystems are already gone, and probably in most the native areas as inexpensive and politically realistic method of animal control. Everything will be okay.

  2. Keith says:

    This is a ridiculous article that is horribly biased and lacking necessary information. If people in Hawaii want to eat pig, they need to raise them in a contained environment. The pigs are destroying native habitat and thusly native species at an alarming rate and give nothing back to the island but food source. Maintaining a feral pig population is sealing a death sentence to the millions of years of specialized evolution that made Hawaii such a unique place to begin with. Hawaii belongs to the native plants birds and sea life not us humans, so we need to respect that and not destroy Hawaii with our selfish desires for pig meat. Raise some at home…

  3. Keith says:

    It’s like I I let some pigs loose in your house and before you got rid of them because they are destroying your house, I claim that I have been hunting them and using them as food for so long that you have no right to remove them. They don’t belong and should not be there…

Trackbacks/Pingbacks


Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

 

 

Become a fan on facebook

 

 

Quantcast
%d bloggers like this: